Before you go! Share this content on any social media platform

In the world of photography, we often hear cases of legality when using photos found online. Sometimes companies use a photographer's photo without their permission and use it to promote products or services, which can sometimes lead to lawsuits and compensation.

Interestingly, a federal court in Virginia has recently ruled that the use of online photos could set a precedent that photographers do not like. The case included a photographer, Russell Brammer, and a company called Violent Hues Productions, which had used one of Brammer's photos without his permission on their website.

Brammer finally sued the company, which argued that it was lawful under US copyright law must meet certain requirements to be considered as "fair use". Eventually, District Judge Claude M. Hilton of the Eastern District of Virginia decided that it met all these requirements. For example, he quoted how the use of the photo was in "good faith" where the owner of Violent Hues did not know that it was copyrighted and how it was used for "factual" use against "creative" use.

Not surprisingly, not many were enthusiastic about the decision and as we said, this decision is a precedent that could be used in future lawsuits that may not necessarily work for photographers.

Filed in General >Photo-Video, Read more about Legal,

Before you go! Share this content on any social media platform

Source link
SOURCES: TECHCRUNCH.COM GSMARENA.COM MACRUMORS.COM FIRSTPOST.COM ANDROIDCENTRAL.COM PHANDROID.COM TECHSPOT.COM
BLEEPINGCOMPUTER.COM NEOWIN.NET KOTAKU.COM CNET.COM
DROID-LIFE.COM ENGADGET.COM ANDROIDPOLICE.COM
ARSTECHNICA.COM HACKADAY.COM UBERGIZMO.COM
XDA-DEVELOPERS.COM TECHCABAL.COM THEVERGE.COM
GIZMODO.COM SMASHINGMAGAZINE COPYBLOGGER EARTHER.COM
IO9.GIZMODO.COM CLICKHOLE.COM POPULARMECHANICS.COM
ITNEWSAFRICA.COM TECHGISTAFRICA.COM ZDNET.COM

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here